Comparison · Prices verified

CrewAI vs LangGraph vs AutoGen (2026): Which Agent Framework Should You Use?

Our verdict

For new projects, pick between CrewAI and LangGraph. CrewAI is the fastest way to stand up a team of role-based agents; LangGraph is the better choice when you need low-level control, durable execution and human-in-the-loop. Skip AutoGen for anything new: Microsoft has put it in maintenance mode and points new work to Microsoft Agent Framework.

CrewAI

Open Source

Framework for orchestrating role-playing AI agents with collaborative intelligence. Perfect for multi-step workflows requiring specialized agent roles and task coordination.

LangGraph

Open Source

Build stateful, multi-actor applications with LLMs using graph-based workflows. Ideal for complex agentic systems requiring cyclical execution and state persistence.

AutoGen

Open Source

Microsoft's open-source framework for multi-agent AI applications in Python and .NET. Now in maintenance mode, with Microsoft Agent Framework as its official successor.

Side by side

What it is
CrewAI: Role-based multi-agent framework (Crews) plus event-driven workflows (Flows)
LangGraph: Low-level orchestration framework for stateful agents
AutoGen: Microsoft's multi-agent framework for Python and .NET
Maintained by
CrewAI: CrewAI Inc.
LangGraph: LangChain
AutoGen: Community-managed; Microsoft has moved to Agent Framework
Status in 2026
CrewAI: Active
LangGraph: Active
AutoGen: Maintenance mode: no new features or enhancements
License
CrewAI: MIT
LangGraph: MIT
AutoGen: MIT (docs CC-BY-4.0)
GitHub stars (15 Oct 2026)
CrewAI: 59.7k
LangGraph: 43.3k
AutoGen: 61.4k
Style
CrewAI: High-level abstractions plus low-level APIs
LangGraph: Low-level graph orchestration; works without LangChain
AutoGen: Conversational agents; AutoGen Studio is a no-code GUI
Durability and human input
CrewAI: Human-in-the-loop input on the hosted platform
LangGraph: Built in: durable execution, human-in-the-loop, short- and long-term memory
AutoGen: Successor adds checkpointing and human-in-the-loop
Hosted platform
CrewAI: Free Basic plan (50 workflow executions a month); Enterprise is custom-priced
LangGraph: LangSmith: free Developer plan, Plus at $39 per seat per month, with deployments metered on top
AutoGen: None; use Microsoft Agent Framework
Enterprise features
CrewAI: SSO, RBAC, VPC deployment on Enterprise
LangGraph: Custom SSO, RBAC and ABAC, self-hosted or hybrid on LangSmith Enterprise
AutoGen: Via Microsoft Agent Framework
Start a new project on it?
CrewAI: Yes
LangGraph: Yes
AutoGen: No: use Microsoft Agent Framework

Which should you choose?

Choose CrewAI if…

  • You think in teams: researcher, writer, reviewer, each with a role and a goal.
  • You want a working multi-agent prototype quickly, with higher-level building blocks.
  • You want a free hosted visual editor to try ideas before committing.

Choose LangGraph if…

  • You need loops, branching and precise control over every step.
  • Agents must survive crashes and resume, or pause for a human to approve.
  • You already use LangSmith for tracing and evals, or want to.

Choose AutoGen if…

  • You already run it in production and need time to plan a migration.
  • You're maintaining code written against its API.
  • For anything new, use Microsoft Agent Framework instead.

The landscape changed

A year ago, “CrewAI vs LangGraph vs AutoGen” was a three-way tie between active projects. Today it’s two active frameworks and one that has stepped aside.

  • AutoGen is in maintenance mode. Its README says it will get no new features, and sends new projects to Microsoft Agent Framework, its enterprise-ready successor.
  • LangGraph grew into a standalone orchestration framework and no longer requires LangChain.
  • CrewAI now has two layers: Crews for role-based teams and Flows for event-driven control.

Two ways to think about agents

CrewAI asks you to describe a team: agents with roles and goals, tasks to complete, and a process that connects them. That structure is why it’s quick to get a first result.

LangGraph asks you to describe a graph: nodes that do work, edges that decide what happens next, and state that flows through it. You write more, but you control exactly when the agent loops, branches, pauses or resumes.

Production concerns

For real deployments, LangGraph’s headline features are the ones that matter: durable execution (an agent survives a failure and picks up where it stopped), human-in-the-loop inspection of state, and memory that persists across sessions.

CrewAI’s platform covers a lot of the same operational ground: tracing, OpenTelemetry, guardrails and human-in-the-loop input, plus a free visual editor on its Basic plan.

What about AutoGen users?

If you’re on AutoGen today, nothing breaks overnight, but it’s community-managed from here. You have two realistic paths:

  1. Migrate to Microsoft Agent Framework, which has an official AutoGen migration guide and supports Python and .NET.
  2. Move to CrewAI or LangGraph, if you’d rather leave the Microsoft stack. Expect a rewrite rather than a version bump, because the programming models differ.

The bottom line

  • Fastest path to a working agent team: CrewAI.
  • Most control, durability and observability for production: LangGraph, with LangSmith if you want a managed platform.
  • .NET shops or existing Microsoft users: look at Microsoft Agent Framework rather than AutoGen.
  • Existing AutoGen apps: keep running, and plan the move.

Also comparing coding tools? Read Cursor vs Windsurf vs GitHub Copilot.

How we compared

Facts about the frameworks come from their official GitHub repositories and pricing pages, checked on 15 October 2026 and listed below. We haven’t benchmarked them, and the advice here reflects what the projects say about themselves. Check the official pages before committing, and tell us if something has changed.

Frequently asked questions

Is AutoGen dead?

Not dead, but frozen. AutoGen's README says it is in maintenance mode, will not receive new features or enhancements, and is community-managed going forward. It names Microsoft Agent Framework as its successor and tells new projects to start there.

What replaced AutoGen?

Microsoft Agent Framework, an MIT-licensed framework for Python and .NET with graph-based workflows, checkpointing, streaming, human-in-the-loop and OpenTelemetry observability. It has migration guides for both AutoGen and Semantic Kernel.

CrewAI or LangGraph: which is easier?

CrewAI is the easier start: it offers high-level abstractions built around roles and tasks. LangGraph is a low-level orchestration framework, so it asks more of you up front and gives you more control in return.

Does LangGraph require LangChain?

No. LangGraph's README says it can be used without LangChain, though it integrates with LangChain's products such as LangSmith.

Are CrewAI and LangGraph free?

Both libraries are MIT-licensed and free. Paid costs come from the hosted platforms: CrewAI has a free Basic plan and custom-priced Enterprise, and LangSmith has a free Developer plan and a $39-per-seat Plus plan with usage-based charges for deployments and extra traces.

What does LangSmith cost in the UAE?

LangSmith is billed in US dollars. At the fixed rate of 3.6725 AED per dollar, the Plus plan ($39 per seat) is about AED 143 a month per seat, so five seats come to about AED 716 before usage charges and any VAT.

Sources

Published October 15, 2026. Spotted something out of date? Let us know.

More comparisons